- Date:
- Read time:
- 4 mins
- Author:
- Stefan Gerlach
Chief Economist
Following the abrupt shift in US trade policy and the announcement of new tariffs, both near- and longer-term household inflation expectations have risen noticeably. But how much weight should be placed on this development? Have increases in expected inflation historically preceded actual inflation, or is their predictive value limited? In this Macro Flash Note, EFG Chief Economist Stefan Gerlach examines the evidence.
Following the Trump administration’s announcement of new tariffs on most trading partners, inflation expectations—as measured by the University of Michigan Survey of Consumers — rose markedly between January and April.
The survey provides estimates of households’ average expected inflation over the next year and the next five years. As shown in the figure below, the average one-year inflation expectation increased from 3.3% in January to 6.7% in April. Over the five-year horizon, expectations rose from 3.2% to 4.4%. These are substantial increases by historical standards.
But how much significance should be attached to these developments? One interpretation is that consumers’ inflation expectations play an important role in shaping actual inflation. If households and firms expect rising prices, these expectations may be incorporated into wage demands and pricing decisions. From this perspective, the rise in expectations is concerning, as it implies a risk of near-term inflationary pressure that would gradually fade over time.
An alternative view is that the public overreacted to the tariff announcements and that these expectations play a limited role in wage-setting and inflation dynamics. If so, the rise in expected inflation may have little bearing on actual outcomes, and the risk of a sharp rise in inflation is correspondingly low.
To assess the predictive value of inflation expectations, monthly data from 1981 onward is used to examine how well they have historically forecast actual consumer price index inflation over the following one and five years. The first scatter plot below compares one-year-ahead expected inflation (horizontal axis) with realized inflation over the same period (vertical axis). If expectations were perfectly accurate, the observations would lie on a 45-degree line through the origin—implying a one-for-one relationship between expected and actual inflation. In such a case, expected inflation would explain 100% of the variation in subsequent inflation.
In practice, while the scatter plot shows a positive relationship, the data are widely dispersed. On average, a 1 percentage point increase in expected inflation is associated with a 0.93 percentage point increase in actual inflation—somewhat less than expected. The proportion of variation in actual inflation explained by expectations, as measured by the R-squared value, is modest at 34%.
Although the correlation is statistically significant, this is not a high bar. It is possible that both expected and actual future inflation are influenced by current inflation, raising the question of whether expected inflation adds any information once current inflation is considered. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the case: expected inflation does not provide additional predictive power for one-year-ahead inflation beyond what is already captured by current inflation.1
The next graph presents the same analysis for a five-year horizon. Here, the relationship is even weaker. A 1 percentage point increase in expected five-year inflation is associated with only a 0.44 percentage point increase in actual inflation. Although statistically significant, the R-squared is just 19%. Once again, expected inflation adds no forecasting power if current inflation is included in the analysis.
Taken together, these results suggest that the recent rise in inflation expectations following the tariff announcements should be interpreted with caution. Historically, expected inflation—at least as measured by the Michigan Survey of Consumers — has limited, and in some cases no, additional predictive value for future inflation once current inflation is accounted for. This suggests that the Federal Reserve is unlikely to place much weight on these data when considering the stance of monetary policy.
1Using data for the period March 1981 to March 2024 to regress inflation one year ahead on the current inflation rate and expected inflation rate, we can reject the hypothesis that the current inflation does not matter (p = 2.3%) but not the hypothesis that the expected inflation rate is irrelevant (p = 79.8%).
Important Information
The value of investments and the income derived from them can fall as well as rise, and past performance is no indicator of future performance. Investment products may be subject to investment risks involving, but not limited to, possible loss of all or part of the principal invested.
This document does not constitute and shall not be construed as a prospectus, advertisement, public offering or placement of, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or solicit, any investment, security, other financial instrument or other product or service. It is not intended to be a final representation of the terms and conditions of any investment, security, other financial instrument or other product or service. This document is for general information only and is not intended as investment advice or any other specific recommendation as to any particular course of action or inaction. The information in this document does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of the recipient. You should seek your own professional advice suitable to your particular circumstances prior to making any investment or if you are in doubt as to the information in this document.
Although information in this document has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no member of the EFG group represents or warrants its accuracy, and such information may be incomplete or condensed. Any opinions in this document are subject to change without notice. This document may contain personal opinions which do not necessarily reflect the position of any member of the EFG group. To the fullest extent permissible by law, no member of the EFG group shall be responsible for the consequences of any errors or omissions herein, or reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein, and each member of the EFG group expressly disclaims any liability, including (without limitation) liability for incidental or consequential damages, arising from the same or resulting from any action or inaction on the part of the recipient in reliance on this document.
The availability of this document in any jurisdiction or country may be contrary to local law or regulation and persons who come into possession of this document should inform themselves of and observe any restrictions. This document may not be reproduced, disclosed or distributed (in whole or in part) to any other person without prior written permission from an authorised member of the EFG group.
This document has been produced by EFG Asset Management (UK) Limited for use by the EFG group and the worldwide subsidiaries and affiliates within the EFG group. EFG Asset Management (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, registered no. 7389746. Registered address: EFG Asset Management (UK) Limited, Park House, 116 Park Street, London W1K 6AP, United Kingdom, telephone +44 (0)20 7491 9111.