RBA and RBNZ: Inflation Targeting in Action

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) was the first central bank to adopt inflation targeting in 1990, a framework that soon became the global standard. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) introduced its own version a few years later. Since then, both have been seen as leading examples of how small open economies can manage monetary policy in a world of volatile trade, commodity prices, and capital flows.

This note reviews how the two banks have operated in recent years. Their mandates and institutional settings share many features, but the shocks of the past few years - Covid, surging inflation, and tight labour markets - produced different responses. Understanding those differences sheds light on how central banks balance inflation control with support for growth, and what that means for policy in the months ahead.

Mandates and institutions

Monetary policy reflects a mix of economic conditions, institutional design, and historical experience. The RBA was created in 1960, taking over central banking functions from the Commonwealth Bank, which had been founded in 1911. The RBNZ was established earlier, in 1934, in response to the Great Depression.

Their objectives are broadly similar. The RBA seeks to keep inflation between 2% and 3% over time while supporting full employment. The RBNZ aims for 1% to 3% inflation with a focus on the 2% midpoint, while also considering financial stability and avoiding unnecessary swings in output, employment, interest rates, or the exchange rate.

Decision-making structures combine internal expertise with external perspectives. The RBA’s Monetary Policy Board has nine members: the Governor, Deputy Governor, Secretary to the Treasury, and six external appointees of the Treasurer. The RBNZ’s Monetary Policy Committee has six members, split evenly between internal officials and external experts, all appointed by the Minister of Finance.

Both banks meet regularly - eight times a year in Australia, seven in New Zealand - and operate mainly through short-term interest rates. The RBA sets the overnight cash rate, while the RBNZ sets the Official Cash Rate, which directly influences the interest paid on deposits and loans with the central bank. After each meeting, the RBA publishes a short statement; the RBNZ issues a fuller Monetary Policy Statement four times a year.

Economic developments

Both central banks eased monetary policy aggressively during the Covid crisis, then tightened it sharply when inflation surged to levels not seen in decades. Inflation peaked earlier in New Zealand, in mid-2022, while in Australia it peaked later that year.

Labour markets also tightened strongly. Unemployment fell to multi-decade lows in both countries, but wages diverged. In New Zealand, wage growth accelerated earlier and more strongly, while inflation expectations deteriorated more quickly. This prompted the RBNZ to raise rates sooner and more forcefully. In Australia, wage growth picked up later and remained more subdued, allowing the RBA to move more gradually.

The difference is clear in policy rates. The RBNZ began tightening first and lifted rates to 5.5% by the third quarter of 2023. The RBA increased rates more slowly, with the overnight cash rate peaking just above 4% by the second quarter of 2024. As a result, the New Zealand economy slowed more sharply, with weaker GDP growth and a higher unemployment rate than in Australia.

Conclusions

By mid-2025, inflation in both countries had declined but had not fully reached target. In Australia, inflation was 2.1% in the second quarter, while the July monthly figure rose to 2.8%. The RBA is unlikely to attach much significance to the monthly data and will focus on third quarter outcomes to judge whether price pressures are easing.

In New Zealand, inflation was 2.7% in the second quarter, close to the top of the RBNZ’s 1-3% band, with domestic cost pressures still evident. Both banks therefore face a similar dilemma: policy is already restrictive, growth is slowing, but inflation risks have not fully receded.

Looking ahead, both central banks are likely to cut rates, though for different reasons. In Australia, further reductions depend on clear evidence that inflation pressures are subsiding, with second quarter data pivotal. On 12 August, the RBA lowered the cash rate to 3.6%, and market pricing suggests investors expect one additional cut before year-end.

In New Zealand, policy easing has already begun. On 20 August, the RBNZ reduced the Official Cash Rate to 3% and explained its decision in terms of both the stalling recovery and the expectation that inflation will decline towards target. It added that, if inflation continues to ease as anticipated, monetary policy could be adjusted further.

Important Information

The value of investments and the income derived from them can fall as well as rise, and past performance is no indicator of future performance. Investment products may be subject to investment risks involving, but not limited to, possible loss of all or part of the principal invested.

This document does not constitute and shall not be construed as a prospectus, advertisement, public offering or placement of, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, hold or solicit, any investment, security, other financial instrument or other product or service. It is not intended to be a final representation of the terms and conditions of any investment, security, other financial instrument or other product or service. This document is for general information only and is not intended as investment advice or any other specific recommendation as to any particular course of action or inaction. The information in this document does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of the recipient. You should seek your own professional advice suitable to your particular circumstances prior to making any investment or if you are in doubt as to the information in this document.

Although information in this document has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no member of the EFG group represents or warrants its accuracy, and such information may be incomplete or condensed. Any opinions in this document are subject to change without notice. This document may contain personal opinions which do not necessarily reflect the position of any member of the EFG group. To the fullest extent permissible by law, no member of the EFG group shall be responsible for the consequences of any errors or omissions herein, or reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein, and each member of the EFG group expressly disclaims any liability, including (without limitation) liability for incidental or consequential damages, arising from the same or resulting from any action or inaction on the part of the recipient in reliance on this document.
The availability of this document in any jurisdiction or country may be contrary to local law or regulation and persons who come into possession of this document should inform themselves of and observe any restrictions. This document may not be reproduced, disclosed or distributed (in whole or in part) to any other person without prior written permission from an authorised member of the EFG group.

This document has been produced by EFG Asset Management (UK) Limited for use by the EFG group and the worldwide subsidiaries and affiliates within the EFG group. EFG Asset Management (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority, registered no. 7389746. Registered address: EFG Asset Management (UK) Limited, Park House, 116 Park Street, London W1K 6AP, United Kingdom, telephone +44 (0)20 7491 9111.